My first shot above i didn't need to use a tripod to get the depth of field right as the light was pretty good so that at even around f/22 with a grad. filter attached it was still possible to shot at speeds which were more suited for hand held photography. I felt that the cows gave a good point of interest in the foreground and because of the downward slope of the river valley beyond and the raised position of the animals it made a very natural looking shot in which although there isn't any pattern or shape to the way the cows are positioned it just seems right.
My next shot needed a little more effort as i had to take into account the movement of the crops and poppies even thought the breeze wasn't really that strong it was still creating enough movement that if i hadn't got my exposure settings just right the whole shot would have been spoiled. In processing this shot i tried cropping it in a few different way but though this work best because first the sky was quiet dull and featureless meaning as mention earlier in the course it was best to completely remove it which meant i ended up with a very square shot but what it does do is focus the attention on the poppies while still drawing the eye maybe not as well as it could through the rest of the frame.I do feel quiet competent with the use of wide angled views as explained in this part of the course as its something that I've been using already in previous assignments and projects but i understand that its best to go over all these points to make sure we're aware of how and when its best to use them.
What i enjoyed about this project was the similarity to assignment 2 in that i could explore the surrounding area to see what the photographer of the original hadn't included and whether i could find some better views. The first above was just a little away from where the original was taken, what i tried to do was create a silhouette of the mine in the background and the building in the foreground but i didn't want to completely loss the detail and have just dark outlines as the structures wouldn't work in this kind of shot.
The above shot i like because of the contrast between the delicate flower and the mine buildings behind, i kept the buildings out of focus by using a small depth of field (about f/10) but not so small that the buildings are so out of focus that there completely unrecognisable and you would see the contrast or understand how surprising it is to find nature retaking the old lead mine.
This shot was taken from near to my original copy but what i wanted to add was more of the surrounding area and show more of the landscape around the mine so i chose a frame it in this way to get the most within the frame and use a 18-50mm lens to accomplish this. Later i cropped some of the sky out because i felt it was a little to dominant in the shot and spoiled it a bit.
I like the way the contrast between the two buildings with the one being very rounded and flat while the other is very angler and straight, also i like the way the two figures near the mine building gives it added scale giving you more idea of the size of the thing.
I'm not a hundred percent sure about this shot because although the footpath leads you up towards the mine on the hill it feels a little small within the frame and doesn't work as well as I'd have liked, don't get me wrong i still think it has a really foreboding presents with the very heavy sky and the mine in the distance adds to this i just wish all the elements were a little closer together.
This view i thought was quiet interesting because of the stack of old pipes which gave even more of a feeling of disuse with the falling down buildings in the background as well. I shot it in black and white because i thought it would create a far more eye catching shot with all the different tones in the stone work,pipes and even the grass and corrugated roof, the colour version just seemed a little dull dew to the way the light was.